Who should choose Accelerate IP
If getting to Tempe is straightforward for you, start with Accelerate IP, and use that first call to ask who would actually handle your matter and how updates are shared.
Key takeaways
- Accelerate IP runs its patent practice out of Tempe with nothing extra listed beyond the shared service set
- Based in Scottsdale, IPTechLaw publishes the same core patent service list you see in Fast Facts
- The published detail is effectively identical, leaving convenience and reachability as the deciding factors
Bottom line — Which firm should I choose?
Nothing in the published detail sets one of these firms apart from the other on service scope. The practical deciders are office location, day-to-day reach and how easily you can start a conversation. Use the Fast Facts table to weigh those against your own situation.
Who should choose IPTechLaw
Try IPTechLaw first if Scottsdale is nearer or easier to reach, and repeat the same intake questions so you are comparing like for like before deciding.
What clients say · side by side
AI review summary
GoogleYelpAvvoBBB
Clients frequently mention
- A pattern across reviews: transparent, set-fee pricing is frequently highlighted and appreciated by clients.
- Reviews frequently cite clear communication and responsive service throughout the legal process.
- Multiple reviews point to the firm's helpfulness in guiding clients through complex intellectual property matters.
Common complaints
- Some feedback points to occasional delays in communication or response times from the firm.
- Some reviewers flag that the initial consultations did not always lead to desired outcomes.
- Several clients cite dissatisfaction with the perceived value or results for the fees paid.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 4 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
AI review summary
GoogleAvvo
Clients frequently mention
- Client feedback tends to highlight the clear communication throughout the patent application process.
- Reviewers frequently mention the firm's thoroughness in preparing complex intellectual property filings.
- Feedback commonly notes the supportive and responsive nature of the legal team.
Common complaints
- A handful of reviews raise concerns about the perceived value in relation to the services provided.
- A recurring complaint involves occasional delays in receiving updates on case progress.
- The most frequent concern is a desire for more detailed explanations of legal strategies.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
| Accelerate IP | IPTechLaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 | 2008 |
| Attorneys | 12 | 8 |
| Offices | 2 | 1 |
| Primary office | Tempe | Scottsdale |
| Cities served | Oro Valley, Tempe | Scottsdale |
| Languages | English | English |
| Free consultation | ||
| Contingency fee | ||
| 24/7 availability | ||
| View Accelerate IP profile | View IPTechLaw profile |
"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.
All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.
Continue exploring
Related comparisons
- Accelerate IP vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Accelerate IP vs Entrepreneurial Law Advisors
- Accelerate IP vs Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC
- Accelerate IP vs The Cpa Attorney
- Accelerate IP vs Israel & Gerity, PLLC
- Accelerate IP vs Thomas W. Galvani, P.C.
- IPTechLaw vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- IPTechLaw vs Entrepreneurial Law Advisors
Browse this market
Cities served