If getting to Phoenix is straightforward for you, start with Bycer & Marion, PLC, and use that first call to ask who would actually handle your matter and how updates are shared.
- Out of Phoenix, Bycer & Marion, PLC advertises the patent services already covered in the Fast Facts rows
- Based in Scottsdale, Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC publishes the same core patent service list you see in Fast Facts
- The published detail is effectively identical, leaving convenience and reachability as the deciding factors
Public records show these two firms covering the same market with comparable listed services. What separates them in practice is where each is based, how their offices are spread, and when intake is reachable. Compare the Fast Facts rows side by side before you call either one.
Try Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC first if Scottsdale is nearer or easier to reach, and repeat the same intake questions so you are comparing like for like before deciding.
What clients say · side by side
- A recurring theme in feedback is the attorneys provide clear, comprehensive guidance on intellectual property matters.
- What stands out in reviews is the firm's effective and diligent handling of the patent application process.
- Reviewers repeatedly note the team's strong communication and responsiveness to client inquiries.
- Some feedback points to a perception of higher costs compared to other options for similar services.
- Some reviewers flag occasional delays in communication, particularly during busy periods.
- Several clients cite a desire for more detailed explanations regarding specific legal procedures.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
- Multiple reviews point to effective communication and responsiveness regarding intellectual property matters.
- Several clients mention the firm's thorough understanding of patent and trademark law.
- A pattern across reviews: clients are satisfied with the strategic advice provided.
- Recurring pushback focuses on occasional perceived delays in case progression.
- A handful of reviews raise concerns about the clarity of billing practices.
- A recurring complaint involves difficulties reaching staff at times.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
| Bycer & Marion, PLC | Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1998 | 2005 |
| Attorneys | 12 | 3 |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| Primary office | Phoenix | Scottsdale |
| Cities served | Phoenix | Scottsdale |
| Languages | English | English |
| Free consultation | ||
| Contingency fee | ||
| 24/7 availability | ||
| View Bycer & Marion, PLC profile | View Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC profile |
"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.
All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.
Continue exploring
- Bycer & Marion, PLC vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Bycer & Marion, PLC vs Accelerate IP
- Bycer & Marion, PLC vs Entrepreneurial Law Advisors
- Bycer & Marion, PLC vs Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC
- Bycer & Marion, PLC vs The Cpa Attorney
- Bycer & Marion, PLC vs Israel & Gerity, PLLC
- Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC vs Accelerate IP
