Who should choose Degnan Horne
If getting to Phoenix is straightforward for you, start with Degnan Horne, and use that first call to ask who would actually handle your matter and how updates are shared.
Key takeaways
- Based in Phoenix, Degnan Horne publishes the same core patent service list you see in Fast Facts
- Denton Peterson, P.C. runs its patent practice out of Scottsdale with nothing extra listed beyond the shared service set
- Nothing in the public record distinguishes the two, so where each office sits and when intake answers is what decides it
Bottom line — Which firm should I choose?
Nothing in the published detail sets one of these firms apart from the other on service scope. The practical deciders are office location, day-to-day reach and how easily you can start a conversation. Use the Fast Facts table to weigh those against your own situation.
Who should choose Denton Peterson, P.C.
Contact Denton Peterson, P.C. first if Scottsdale suits you better, then ask the same intake questions about staffing, timelines and communication so you can compare the two answers side by side.
What clients say · side by side
AI review summary
GoogleAvvo
Clients frequently mention
- A recurring theme in feedback is effective communication and updates on case progress.
- What stands out in reviews is the firm's successful resolution of complex legal matters.
- Reviewers repeatedly note the supportive and understanding approach of the legal team.
Common complaints
- A handful of reviews raise concerns about responsiveness at certain stages of representation.
- A recurring complaint involves perceived delays in reaching specific attorneys.
- The most frequent concern is the clarity of billing practices for some clients.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
AI review summary
GoogleYelpAvvoBBBFacebook
Clients frequently mention
- Multiple reviews point to effective and professional communication.
- Several clients mention successful outcomes in complex business matters.
- A pattern across reviews: a high level of responsiveness and clear advice.
Common complaints
- The most frequent concern is communication issues, particularly unreturned calls.
- Recurring pushback focuses on dissatisfaction with billing practices or unexpected fees.
- A handful of reviews raise issues regarding the perceived value for the services rendered.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 5 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
| Degnan Horne | Denton Peterson, P.C. | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2007 |
| Attorneys | 2 | 8 |
| Offices | 1 | 3 |
| Primary office | Phoenix | Scottsdale |
| Cities served | Phoenix | Scottsdale |
| Languages | English | English |
| Free consultation | ||
| Contingency fee | ||
| 24/7 availability | ||
| View Degnan Horne profile | View Denton Peterson, P.C. profile |
"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.
All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.
Continue exploring
Related comparisons
- Degnan Horne vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Degnan Horne vs Accelerate IP
- Degnan Horne vs Entrepreneurial Law Advisors
- Degnan Horne vs Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC
- Degnan Horne vs The Cpa Attorney
- Degnan Horne vs Israel & Gerity, PLLC
- Denton Peterson, P.C. vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Denton Peterson, P.C. vs Accelerate IP
Browse this market
Cities served