Reach out to Degnan Horne when Phoenix is the easier place for you to drop off documents or meet in person, then confirm the staffing and communication arrangements during intake.
- Degnan Horne handles patent matters from Phoenix, matching the published service list shown alongside
- Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC works from Scottsdale and lists the same core patent services shown in Fast Facts
- The published detail is effectively identical, leaving convenience and reachability as the deciding factors
Public records show these two firms covering the same market with comparable listed services. What separates them in practice is where each is based, how their offices are spread, and when intake is reachable. Compare the Fast Facts rows side by side before you call either one.
Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC makes more sense as a first call when Scottsdale fits your routine; ask who would run your matter, how long it typically takes and how you will be kept informed.
What clients say · side by side
- A recurring theme in feedback is effective communication and updates on case progress.
- What stands out in reviews is the firm's successful resolution of complex legal matters.
- Reviewers repeatedly note the supportive and understanding approach of the legal team.
- A handful of reviews raise concerns about responsiveness at certain stages of representation.
- A recurring complaint involves perceived delays in reaching specific attorneys.
- The most frequent concern is the clarity of billing practices for some clients.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
- Multiple reviews point to effective communication and responsiveness regarding intellectual property matters.
- Several clients mention the firm's thorough understanding of patent and trademark law.
- A pattern across reviews: clients are satisfied with the strategic advice provided.
- Recurring pushback focuses on occasional perceived delays in case progression.
- A handful of reviews raise concerns about the clarity of billing practices.
- A recurring complaint involves difficulties reaching staff at times.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
| Degnan Horne | Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2005 |
| Attorneys | 2 | 3 |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| Primary office | Phoenix | Scottsdale |
| Cities served | Phoenix | Scottsdale |
| Languages | English | English |
| Free consultation | ||
| Contingency fee | ||
| 24/7 availability | ||
| View Degnan Horne profile | View Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC profile |
"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.
All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.
Continue exploring
- Degnan Horne vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Degnan Horne vs Accelerate IP
- Degnan Horne vs Entrepreneurial Law Advisors
- Degnan Horne vs Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC
- Degnan Horne vs The Cpa Attorney
- Degnan Horne vs Israel & Gerity, PLLC
- Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC vs Accelerate IP
