If getting to Phoenix is straightforward for you, start with Degnan Horne, and use that first call to ask who would actually handle your matter and how updates are shared.
- Out of Phoenix, Degnan Horne advertises the patent services already covered in the Fast Facts rows
- RM Warner Law - Internet/Corporate Lawyers runs its patent practice out of Scottsdale with nothing extra listed beyond the shared service set
- Neither firm shows a documented edge here, so pick on travel distance and how easily you can reach intake
On the public record these firms look alike: same market, same listed service areas. That leaves logistics as the real question — which office is easier to reach, and which intake window fits your schedule. Read the Fast Facts side by side, then contact the one that suits you.
RM Warner Law - Internet/Corporate Lawyers makes more sense as a first call when Scottsdale fits your routine; ask who would run your matter, how long it typically takes and how you will be kept informed.
What clients say · side by side
- A recurring theme in feedback is effective communication and updates on case progress.
- What stands out in reviews is the firm's successful resolution of complex legal matters.
- Reviewers repeatedly note the supportive and understanding approach of the legal team.
- A handful of reviews raise concerns about responsiveness at certain stages of representation.
- A recurring complaint involves perceived delays in reaching specific attorneys.
- The most frequent concern is the clarity of billing practices for some clients.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
- Several clients mention the firm's effective handling of complex internet defamation and intellectual property cases.
- A pattern across reviews: clients appreciate the clear communication and responsiveness from the legal team.
- Reviews frequently cite the firm's successful strategies in removing negative online content and protecting reputations.
- Several clients cite dissatisfaction with the overall cost of services relative to the perceived outcome.
- A few reviewers mention occasional delays in communication or updates regarding their case progress.
- Some feedback points to concerns about the firm's availability for immediate consultations.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
| Degnan Horne | RM Warner Law - Internet/Corporate Lawyers | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2008 |
| Attorneys | 2 | 8 |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| Primary office | Phoenix | Scottsdale |
| Cities served | Phoenix | Scottsdale |
| Languages | English | English |
| Free consultation | ||
| Contingency fee | ||
| 24/7 availability | ||
| View Degnan Horne profile | View RM Warner Law - Internet/Corporate Lawyers profile |
"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.
All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.
Continue exploring
- Degnan Horne vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Degnan Horne vs Accelerate IP
- Degnan Horne vs Entrepreneurial Law Advisors
- Degnan Horne vs Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC
- Degnan Horne vs The Cpa Attorney
- Degnan Horne vs Israel & Gerity, PLLC
- RM Warner Law - Internet/Corporate Lawyers vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- RM Warner Law - Internet/Corporate Lawyers vs Accelerate IP
