Who should choose Degnan Horne
Contact Degnan Horne first if Phoenix is the more convenient base for meetings and paperwork, and confirm during intake how your matter would be staffed and how often you would receive updates.
Key takeaways
- Based in Phoenix, Degnan Horne publishes the same core patent service list you see in Fast Facts
- Out of Phoenix, Weiss & Moy PC advertises the patent services already covered in the Fast Facts rows
- Nothing in the public record distinguishes the two, so where each office sits and when intake answers is what decides it
Bottom line — Which firm should I choose?
On the public record these firms look alike: same market, same listed service areas. That leaves logistics as the real question — which office is easier to reach, and which intake window fits your schedule. Read the Fast Facts side by side, then contact the one that suits you.
Who should choose Weiss & Moy PC
Try Weiss & Moy PC first if Phoenix is nearer or easier to reach, and repeat the same intake questions so you are comparing like for like before deciding.
What clients say · side by side
AI review summary
GoogleAvvo
Clients frequently mention
- A recurring theme in feedback is effective communication and updates on case progress.
- What stands out in reviews is the firm's successful resolution of complex legal matters.
- Reviewers repeatedly note the supportive and understanding approach of the legal team.
Common complaints
- A handful of reviews raise concerns about responsiveness at certain stages of representation.
- A recurring complaint involves perceived delays in reaching specific attorneys.
- The most frequent concern is the clarity of billing practices for some clients.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
AI review summary
GoogleAvvo
Clients frequently mention
- Several clients commend the attorneys' clear explanations of complex patent processes.
- A pattern across reviews: the firm provides effective strategic advice for intellectual property matters.
- Reviews frequently cite the team's responsiveness and helpful communication throughout engagements.
Common complaints
- A less common but recurring note is concerns about the overall cost of services.
- Occasional criticism touches on the perceived speed of certain administrative aspects.
- Common criticism centers on communication gaps regarding case progress updates.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
| Degnan Horne | Weiss & Moy PC | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 1998 |
| Attorneys | 2 | 8 |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| Primary office | Phoenix | Phoenix |
| Cities served | Phoenix | Phoenix |
| Languages | English | English |
| Free consultation | ||
| Contingency fee | ||
| 24/7 availability | ||
| View Degnan Horne profile | View Weiss & Moy PC profile |
"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.
All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.
Continue exploring
Related comparisons
- Degnan Horne vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Degnan Horne vs Accelerate IP
- Degnan Horne vs Entrepreneurial Law Advisors
- Degnan Horne vs Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC
- Degnan Horne vs The Cpa Attorney
- Degnan Horne vs Israel & Gerity, PLLC
- Weiss & Moy PC vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Weiss & Moy PC vs Accelerate IP
Browse this market
Cities served