Contact Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC first if Mesa is the more convenient base for meetings and paperwork, and confirm during intake how your matter would be staffed and how often you would receive updates.
- Based in Mesa, Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC publishes the same core patent service list you see in Fast Facts
- RM Warner Law - Internet/Corporate Lawyers runs its patent practice out of Scottsdale with nothing extra listed beyond the shared service set
- Nothing in the public record distinguishes the two, so where each office sits and when intake answers is what decides it
Both firms serve the same market and offer similar publicly listed services. The clearest differences are in location, office coverage, and intake availability. Review the Fast Facts side by side before deciding which firm fits your needs.
Contact RM Warner Law - Internet/Corporate Lawyers first if Scottsdale suits you better, then ask the same intake questions about staffing, timelines and communication so you can compare the two answers side by side.
What clients say · side by side
- Several reviews single out responsive communication and clear explanations.
- Among the public reviews analyzed, clients often mention effective representation in complex legal matters.
- Recurring pushback focuses on initial consultations not meeting expectations.
- A handful of reviews raise concerns about perceived value for legal fees.
- A recurring complaint involves perceived delays in case progression.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 4 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
- Several clients mention the firm's effective handling of complex internet defamation and intellectual property cases.
- A pattern across reviews: clients appreciate the clear communication and responsiveness from the legal team.
- Reviews frequently cite the firm's successful strategies in removing negative online content and protecting reputations.
- Several clients cite dissatisfaction with the overall cost of services relative to the perceived outcome.
- A few reviewers mention occasional delays in communication or updates regarding their case progress.
- Some feedback points to concerns about the firm's availability for immediate consultations.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
| Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC | RM Warner Law - Internet/Corporate Lawyers | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1995 | 2008 |
| Attorneys | 12 | 8 |
| Offices | 3 | 1 |
| Primary office | Mesa | Scottsdale |
| Cities served | Mesa | Scottsdale |
| Languages | English | English |
| Free consultation | ||
| Contingency fee | ||
| 24/7 availability | ||
| View Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC profile | View RM Warner Law - Internet/Corporate Lawyers profile |
"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.
All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.
Continue exploring
- Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC vs Accelerate IP
- Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC vs Entrepreneurial Law Advisors
- Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC vs The Cpa Attorney
- Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC vs Israel & Gerity, PLLC
- Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC vs Thomas W. Galvani, P.C.
- RM Warner Law - Internet/Corporate Lawyers vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- RM Warner Law - Internet/Corporate Lawyers vs Accelerate IP
