DontHireBlind.com

Friedl Richardson vs Hastings & Hastings

4.9· 130 reviewsFriedl Richardson4.7· 1146 reviewsHastings & Hastings
Updated September 2026
ShareXFacebook
Key takeaways
  • Prioritizing cases involving catastrophic injury or product liability points to Friedl Richardson Trial Lawyers.
  • Hastings & Hastings stands out for car accidents, truck accidents, or slip and fall cases.
  • Bilingual support in Spanish is a key offering from Hastings & Hastings for those requiring it.
Bottom line — Which firm should I choose?

When considering personal injury representation in Arizona, the primary distinction lies in sub-practice focus. Friedl Richardson Trial Lawyers is better suited for catastrophic injury and product liability claims, while Hastings & Hastings is a strong fit for common motor vehicle accidents and premises liability cases like slip and fall.

Who should choose Friedl Richardson

Choose Friedl Richardson Trial Lawyers if your personal injury claim involves complex product liability issues or severe, life-altering catastrophic injuries beyond typical accident cases, requiring a focused approach on these specific areas.

Who should choose Hastings & Hastings

Choose Hastings & Hastings if you are in the Phoenix area, including Scottsdale or Glendale, and value convenient walk-in access to legal services across a broader range of locations throughout the state for your personal injury matter.

What clients say · side by side

Friedl Richardson logoFriedl Richardson Trial Lawyers
AI review summary
GoogleYelpAvvoBBBFacebook
Clients frequently mention
  • Reviewers highlight effective communication and responsiveness throughout the legal process.
  • Feedback frequently notes the attorneys' compassionate approach during difficult times.
  • The most common praise centers on the firm's successful advocacy and positive case outcomes.
Common complaints
  • Common criticism centers on occasional delays in case progression updates.
  • Feedback occasionally notes perceptions of insufficient communication regarding case specifics.
  • A less common but recurring note is the desire for more frequent attorney-initiated check-ins.

Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 5 sources · Last updated August 2026.

AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.

Hastings & Hastings logoHastings & Hastings
AI review summary
GoogleYelpAvvoBBB
Clients frequently mention
  • Reviewers frequently highlight the legal team's responsiveness and clear communication.
  • Many clients express satisfaction with successful case outcomes and settlements.
  • Feedback often points to the perceived value and favorable fee structure.
Common complaints
  • Some reviewers report slow progress or delays in their case handling.
  • Clients occasionally mention difficulties in reaching their assigned case manager.
  • A few reviewers experienced unexpected issues with billing or fees.

Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 4 sources · Last updated August 2026.

AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.

Friedl RichardsonHastings & Hastings
Founded19991981
Attorneys918
Offices15
Primary officePhoenixPhoenix
Cities servedPhoenixPhoenix, Mesa, Scottsdale, Glendale, Avondale
LanguagesEnglishEnglish, Spanish
Free consultation
Contingency fee
24/7 availability
View Friedl Richardson profileView Hastings & Hastings profile

"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.

All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.

Continue exploring

Request Information

Have questions? Take the next step.

Share a few details and we'll help connect you with the information you're looking for. Free to submit, no obligation, secure.