Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC is the simpler starting point when Scottsdale suits your travel and schedule; ask on the first call about staffing, expected timelines and how often you will hear back.
- Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC works from Scottsdale and lists the same core patent services shown in Fast Facts
- Out of Phoenix, Thomas W. Galvani, P.C. advertises the patent services already covered in the Fast Facts rows
- No documented difference separates these two firms today — location and availability are the practical deciders
Public records show these two firms covering the same market with comparable listed services. What separates them in practice is where each is based, how their offices are spread, and when intake is reachable. Compare the Fast Facts rows side by side before you call either one.
Where Phoenix is the easier location for you, begin with Thomas W. Galvani, P.C. and put the same questions on staffing, timing and updates to them so the answers are comparable.
What clients say · side by side
- Multiple reviews point to effective communication and responsiveness regarding intellectual property matters.
- Several clients mention the firm's thorough understanding of patent and trademark law.
- A pattern across reviews: clients are satisfied with the strategic advice provided.
- Recurring pushback focuses on occasional perceived delays in case progression.
- A handful of reviews raise concerns about the clarity of billing practices.
- A recurring complaint involves difficulties reaching staff at times.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
- Feedback frequently notes thorough and effective communication throughout the patent process.
- The most common praise centers on the firm's in-depth knowledge of intellectual property law.
- Client feedback tends to highlight successful outcomes for patent and trademark applications.
- A recurring complaint involves the perceived high cost of legal services.
- The most frequent concern is the length of time taken for case progression.
- Recurring pushback focuses on occasional difficulties reaching staff directly.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 3 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
| Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC | Thomas W. Galvani, P.C. | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2005 |
| Attorneys | 3 | 2 |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| Primary office | Scottsdale | Phoenix |
| Cities served | Scottsdale | Phoenix |
| Languages | English | English |
| Free consultation | ||
| Contingency fee | ||
| 24/7 availability | ||
| View Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC profile | View Thomas W. Galvani, P.C. profile |
"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.
All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.
Continue exploring
- Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC vs Accelerate IP
- Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC vs Entrepreneurial Law Advisors
- Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC vs Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC
- Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC vs The Cpa Attorney
- Law Office of Jeffrey Herman, PLC vs Israel & Gerity, PLLC
- Thomas W. Galvani, P.C. vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Thomas W. Galvani, P.C. vs Accelerate IP
