Contact Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys first if Phoenix is the more convenient base for meetings and paperwork, and confirm during intake how your matter would be staffed and how often you would receive updates.
- Based in Phoenix, Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys publishes the same core personal injury service list you see in Fast Facts
- Zanes Law Injury Lawyers handles personal injury matters from Tucson, matching the published service list shown alongside
- The published detail is effectively identical, leaving convenience and reachability as the deciding factors
On the public record these firms look alike: same market, same listed service areas. That leaves logistics as the real question — which office is easier to reach, and which intake window fits your schedule. Read the Fast Facts side by side, then contact the one that suits you.
Try Zanes Law Injury Lawyers first if Tucson is nearer or easier to reach, and repeat the same intake questions so you are comparing like for like before deciding.
What clients say · side by side
- Feedback frequently notes the firm's helpful communication and guidance throughout the legal process.
- The most common praise centers on the dedicated and supportive staff members.
- Reviewers highlight satisfaction with the outcomes achieved in their cases.
- A recurring complaint involves difficulties in reaching attorneys directly or receiving timely updates.
- The most frequent concern is the perceived slow pace of case progression and resolution.
- Recurring pushback focuses on dissatisfaction with settlement offers received.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 5 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
- Reviews frequently highlight the legal teams' effective communication and responsiveness.
- Clients often report successful outcomes and substantial compensation.
- Many reviews praise the supportive staff and attorneys for providing clear guidance.
- Some reviews mention occasional delays in the progression of cases.
- A recurring concern involves difficulties in reaching specific case managers or attorneys.
- The most frequent complaint points to a perceived lack of individual attention for some clients.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 4 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
| Lerner & Rowe | Zanes Law | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2002 |
| Attorneys | 60 | 28 |
| Offices | 9 | 6 |
| Primary office | Phoenix | Tucson |
| Cities served | Phoenix, Tucson, Mesa, Glendale, Tempe, Yuma | Mesa, Phoenix, Tucson, Yuma |
| Languages | English, Spanish | English, Spanish |
| Free consultation | ||
| Contingency fee | ||
| 24/7 availability | ||
| View Lerner & Rowe profile | View Zanes Law profile |
"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.
All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.
