Who should choose Lorona Mead
If getting to Phoenix is straightforward for you, start with Lorona Mead, PLC, and use that first call to ask who would actually handle your matter and how updates are shared.
Key takeaways
- Out of Phoenix, Lorona Mead, PLC advertises the personal injury services already covered in the Fast Facts rows
- Skousen, Gulbrandsen & Patience runs its personal injury practice out of Mesa with nothing extra listed beyond the shared service set
- Neither firm shows a documented edge here, so pick on travel distance and how easily you can reach intake
Bottom line — Which firm should I choose?
Public records show these two firms covering the same market with comparable listed services. What separates them in practice is where each is based, how their offices are spread, and when intake is reachable. Compare the Fast Facts rows side by side before you call either one.
Who should choose Skousen Patience
Skousen, Gulbrandsen & Patience makes more sense as a first call when Mesa fits your routine; ask who would run your matter, how long it typically takes and how you will be kept informed.
What clients say · side by side
AI review summary
GoogleYelpAvvoFacebook
Clients frequently mention
- Multiple reviews point to excellent communication and regular updates.
- Several clients mention knowledgeable and compassionate legal representation.
- A pattern across reviews: successful outcomes and fair settlements achieved.
Common complaints
- Some reviewers flag slow case progression and infrequent communication.
- Several clients cite difficulties reaching attorneys directly by phone.
- A few reviewers mention unexpected billing issues or unclear fees.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 4 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
AI review summary
GoogleYelpAvvoBBB
Clients frequently mention
- Client feedback frequently highlights the firm's exceptional communication and regular case updates.
- Reviewers often mention the dedicated and compassionate support provided, which makes clients feel understood.
- Feedback commonly notes the successful outcomes and fair settlements achieved by the legal team.
Common complaints
- Occasional criticism points to perceived delays in case resolution or slower communication at times.
- Some clients have expressed a desire for greater transparency regarding case progression.
- Feedback occasionally includes dissatisfaction with the perceived value of services in relation to legal fees.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 4 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
| Lorona Mead | Skousen Patience | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 | 1968 |
| Attorneys | 7 | 14 |
| Offices | 1 | 2 |
| Primary office | Phoenix | Mesa |
| Cities served | Phoenix, Scottsdale | Mesa, Gilbert, Chandler |
| Languages | English, Spanish | English, Spanish |
| Free consultation | ||
| Contingency fee | ||
| 24/7 availability | ||
| View Lorona Mead profile | View Skousen Patience profile |
"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.
All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.
Continue exploring
Related comparisons
Browse this market