DontHireBlind.com

Begam Marks vs Lerner & Rowe

5.0· 46 reviewsBegam Marks4.7· 3704 reviewsLerner & Rowe
Updated September 2026
ShareXFacebook
Key takeaways
  • Begam Marks & Traulsen, P.A. offers materially longer operating history and handles aviation, trucking, and catastrophic injury.
  • Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys focuses on car, truck, and motorcycle accidents, with walk-in access across more of Arizona.
  • Begam Marks & Traulsen, P.A. has a longer track record, while Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys offers 24/7 availability.
Bottom line — Which firm should I choose?

When immediate access is paramount, Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys provides 24/7 availability for urgent needs. Conversely, if you prioritize a firm with a longer operational history, Begam Marks & Traulsen, P.A. might be a more fitting choice, though it does not list 24/7 access.

Who should choose Begam Marks

Choose Begam Marks & Traulsen, P.A. if you are dealing with complex cases like aviation, trucking, or catastrophic injury and value a firm with a materially longer established operating history in personal injury law.

Who should choose Lerner & Rowe

Choose Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys if your case involves car, truck, or motorcycle accidents and you prefer the convenience of walk-in access available across a broader geographic presence within Arizona, particularly around Phoenix.

What clients say · side by side

AI review summary
GoogleYelpAvvoBBBFacebook
Clients frequently mention
  • Feedback frequently notes the firm's attorneys provide compassionate and highly effective legal representation.
  • The most common praise centers on consistent communication and detailed updates throughout the legal process.
  • Client feedback tends to highlight the firm's successful outcomes and strong advocacy for their clients.
Common complaints
  • A less common but recurring note is occasional frustration with the perceived length of legal proceedings.
  • Occasional criticism touches on difficulties in initial contact or responsiveness during early stages.
  • Common criticism centers on some clients feeling their case was not prioritized as much as expected.

Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 5 sources · Last updated August 2026.

AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.

AI review summary
GoogleYelpAvvoBBBFacebook
Clients frequently mention
  • Feedback frequently notes the firm's helpful communication and guidance throughout the legal process.
  • The most common praise centers on the dedicated and supportive staff members.
  • Reviewers highlight satisfaction with the outcomes achieved in their cases.
Common complaints
  • A recurring complaint involves difficulties in reaching attorneys directly or receiving timely updates.
  • The most frequent concern is the perceived slow pace of case progression and resolution.
  • Recurring pushback focuses on dissatisfaction with settlement offers received.

Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 5 sources · Last updated August 2026.

AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.

Begam MarksLerner & Rowe
Founded19572005
Attorneys660
Offices19
Primary officePhoenixPhoenix
Cities servedPhoenixPhoenix, Tucson, Mesa, Glendale, Tempe, Yuma
LanguagesEnglish, SpanishEnglish, Spanish
Free consultation
Contingency fee
24/7 availability
View Begam Marks profileView Lerner & Rowe profile

"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.

All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.

Request Information

Have questions? Take the next step.

Share a few details and we'll help connect you with the information you're looking for. Free to submit, no obligation, secure.