Who should choose IPTechLaw
If getting to Scottsdale is straightforward for you, start with IPTechLaw, and use that first call to ask who would actually handle your matter and how updates are shared.
Key takeaways
- Out of Scottsdale, IPTechLaw advertises the patent services already covered in the Fast Facts rows
- Based in Peoria, Patent Agent Bruce A. Lev publishes the same core patent service list you see in Fast Facts
- Nothing in the public record distinguishes the two, so where each office sits and when intake answers is what decides it
Bottom line — Which firm should I choose?
Both firms serve the same market and offer similar publicly listed services. The clearest differences are in location, office coverage, and intake availability. Review the Fast Facts side by side before deciding which firm fits your needs.
Who should choose Patent Agent Bruce A. Lev
Contact Patent Agent Bruce A. Lev first if Peoria suits you better, then ask the same intake questions about staffing, timelines and communication so you can compare the two answers side by side.
What clients say · side by side
AI review summary
GoogleAvvo
Clients frequently mention
- Client feedback tends to highlight the clear communication throughout the patent application process.
- Reviewers frequently mention the firm's thoroughness in preparing complex intellectual property filings.
- Feedback commonly notes the supportive and responsive nature of the legal team.
Common complaints
- A handful of reviews raise concerns about the perceived value in relation to the services provided.
- A recurring complaint involves occasional delays in receiving updates on case progress.
- The most frequent concern is a desire for more detailed explanations of legal strategies.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
AI review summary
GoogleAvvo
Clients frequently mention
- Several reviews highlight the agent's thorough understanding of patent law and procedures.
- A recurring theme in feedback is the clear and effective communication throughout the patent process.
- What stands out in reviews is the agent's helpful guidance for inventors new to patent applications.
Common complaints
- Some reviewers flag occasional delays in responsiveness to inquiries.
- Several clients cite a desire for more frequent updates on application status.
- A few reviewers mention the perceived cost as a concern for budget-conscious inventors.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 2 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
| IPTechLaw | Patent Agent Bruce A. Lev | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 | 2006 |
| Attorneys | 8 | 1 |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| Primary office | Scottsdale | Peoria |
| Cities served | Scottsdale | Peoria |
| Languages | English | English |
| Free consultation | ||
| Contingency fee | ||
| 24/7 availability | ||
| View IPTechLaw profile | View Patent Agent Bruce A. Lev profile |
"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.
All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.
Continue exploring
Related comparisons
- IPTechLaw vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- IPTechLaw vs Accelerate IP
- IPTechLaw vs Entrepreneurial Law Advisors
- IPTechLaw vs Denton Peterson Dunn, PLLC
- IPTechLaw vs The Cpa Attorney
- IPTechLaw vs Israel & Gerity, PLLC
- Patent Agent Bruce A. Lev vs Aspey, Watkins & Diesel PLLC - AWD LAW
- Patent Agent Bruce A. Lev vs Accelerate IP
Browse this market
Cities served