DontHireBlind.com

Lerner & Rowe vs Lloyd Baker

4.7· 3704 reviewsLerner & Rowe4.9· 840 reviewsLloyd Baker
Updated September 2026
ShareXFacebook
Key takeaways
  • Lerner & Rowe excels in diverse personal injury cases, including truck accidents, slip and fall, and wrongful death.
  • Lloyd Baker is strong in business litigation, contract law, and corporate governance in addition to personal injury.
  • Lerner & Rowe offers walk-in access across more Arizona locations, especially around Phoenix and Yuma.
Bottom line — Which firm should I choose?

For injury cases beyond car and motorcycle accidents, Lerner & Rowe offers broader personal injury specializations. Conversely, if your needs extend to business litigation or corporate governance alongside personal injury, Lloyd Baker Injury Attorneys provides a more comprehensive legal scope.

Who should choose Lerner & Rowe

Choose Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys if you are seeking representation for a truck accident, slip and fall incident, or wrongful death claim. Their accessible offices around Phoenix and Yuma might also suit your geographic convenience for in-person consultations.

Who should choose Lloyd Baker

Choose Lloyd Baker Injury Attorneys if your legal needs encompass business litigation, contract law, or corporate governance, in addition to personal injury matters like car or motorcycle accidents. They offer a broader legal service range beyond just injury claims.

What clients say · side by side

AI review summary
GoogleYelpAvvoBBBFacebook
Clients frequently mention
  • Feedback frequently notes the firm's helpful communication and guidance throughout the legal process.
  • The most common praise centers on the dedicated and supportive staff members.
  • Reviewers highlight satisfaction with the outcomes achieved in their cases.
Common complaints
  • A recurring complaint involves difficulties in reaching attorneys directly or receiving timely updates.
  • The most frequent concern is the perceived slow pace of case progression and resolution.
  • Recurring pushback focuses on dissatisfaction with settlement offers received.

Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 5 sources · Last updated August 2026.

AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.

AI review summary
GoogleYelpAvvoBBBFacebook
Clients frequently mention
  • A recurring theme in feedback is the highly effective and persistent communication from legal teams.
  • What stands out in reviews is the successful navigation of complex legal processes for clients.
  • Reviewers repeatedly note the empathetic and supportive client care provided throughout their cases.
Common complaints
  • A less common but recurring note is occasional delays in receiving updates or information.
  • Occasional criticism touches on the perceived lengthy duration of some case resolutions.
  • Common criticism centers on a lack of clarity regarding certain aspects of billing or fees.

Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 5 sources · Last updated August 2026.

AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.

Lerner & RoweLloyd Baker
Founded20052009
Attorneys6035
Offices94
Primary officePhoenixPhoenix
Cities servedPhoenix, Tucson, Mesa, Glendale, Tempe, YumaGlendale, Mesa, Phoenix, Tucson
LanguagesEnglish, SpanishEnglish, Spanish
Free consultation
Contingency fee
24/7 availability
View Lerner & Rowe profileView Lloyd Baker profile

"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.

All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.

Request Information

Have questions? Take the next step.

Share a few details and we'll help connect you with the information you're looking for. Free to submit, no obligation, secure.