Lerner & Rowe makes more sense when your case involves vehicle-specific incidents like car or motorcycle accidents, and you value a firm with a concentrated presence around Phoenix and its nearby cities like Mesa and Glendale for in-person consultations.
- In-person appointments available in more locations may appeal to those prioritizing accessibility with Lerner & Rowe.
- Sweet James handles catastrophic injury cases, which may be a key factor for specific injury needs.
- Named recognition through Super Lawyers and the Million Dollar Advocates Forum distinguishes Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys.
While both firms handle wrongful death cases, Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys also focuses on car, truck, and motorcycle accidents, whereas Sweet James Accident Attorneys includes auto accidents and catastrophic injury in their practice areas. Your choice depends on the specific type of personal injury you need assistance with.
If you are dealing with a catastrophic injury or general auto accident, Sweet James Accident Attorneys could be a fitting choice, especially if helpful communication and guidance throughout the legal process are your top priorities.
What clients say · side by side
- Feedback frequently notes the firm's helpful communication and guidance throughout the legal process.
- The most common praise centers on the dedicated and supportive staff members.
- Reviewers highlight satisfaction with the outcomes achieved in their cases.
- A recurring complaint involves difficulties in reaching attorneys directly or receiving timely updates.
- The most frequent concern is the perceived slow pace of case progression and resolution.
- Recurring pushback focuses on dissatisfaction with settlement offers received.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 5 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
- A pattern across reviews: effective communication and regular updates on case progress.
- Reviews frequently cite successful outcomes and satisfactory settlements for clients.
- Multiple reviews point to the firm's dedicated and responsive legal team members.
- A handful of reviews raise concerns about slow response times from support staff.
- A recurring complaint involves difficulties in reaching specific attorneys directly.
- The most frequent concern is the perceived lack of personalized attention for some cases.
Based on publicly available reviews analyzed across 5 sources · Last updated August 2026.
AI-generated themes based on patterns in publicly available client reviews. Not direct quotes. Always read individual reviews before deciding.
| Lerner & Rowe | Sweet James | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2011 |
| Attorneys | 60 | 50 |
| Offices | 9 | 1 |
| Primary office | Phoenix | Phoenix |
| Cities served | Phoenix, Tucson, Mesa, Glendale, Tempe, Yuma | Phoenix |
| Languages | English, Spanish | English, Spanish |
| Free consultation | ||
| Contingency fee | ||
| 24/7 availability | ||
| View Lerner & Rowe profile | View Sweet James profile |
"Not publicly disclosed" means the firm doesn't publish this figure — it is not a score of zero.
All information is based on publicly available data and is subject to change. We make every effort to keep it accurate, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Always confirm details directly with the firm before making a hiring decision.
